Preston Crawford <me at prestoncrawford.com> wrote: > I didn't say it was you. Although, my inbox is filled with > about 50% responses from you, so maybe you're onto something > there. Maybe _now_, but not _earlier_. Consider the chronology here. ;-> > Of course. And in fact you've made some good points that I > agree with with regards to using LTO storage, how to share > printers, etc. Whether you agree with me or not, it was a wound for me to see you say this yet again -- almost exactly like you have said on-list and off-list several times now. So is it me, even before I respond? Think about that before you refer to the "50%" next time. ;-> > I was just pointing out my opinion on why the list was so > overtaken with traffic lately. I think it's time, now more than ever, to adopt the "Linux/Sun Managers" format. It would let these little "I know best" tit-tat-toe discussions and tangents stay off-line, and *1* person would summarize it all, the original question poster. Either that or a separate "practices" list. This discussion was _definitely_ a candidate. > No. Sorry to disappoint. I refer again to the "50%" above. ;-> -- Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org | (please excuse any http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)