Craig White wrote: >On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 22:13 -0500, Jim Perrin wrote: > > >>>I've been chastised in the past for giving long, drawn-out answers >>>instead of shorter, more "cookbook" answers (including from yourself if >>>I am not mistaken ;-) -- especially when treating the original poster >>>like a "noob" in the eyes of some (e.g., the non-existance of the >>>remote .ssh directory, which a user who has used scp would probably >>>know). So my post was trying to keep it that way. >>> >>> >>> >>Mostly accurate. I criticized you for offering theory to someone >>wanting practice. My addition here still falls within the boundaries >>of practice. Also, I've NEVER criticized you for the verbosity of your >>responses. I've criticized you and SEVERAL others for the QUANTITY of >>responses to a thread, and for refusing to let a thread die. You're >>not the worst offender here for that, although you're the most >>infamous for it. War & peace is a shorter read than some of the recent >>threads on the list (general statement of fact. not directed at you. >>don't get worked up.) >> >>Side note - >> >><flame suit on> Didn't you request to be removed from posting to the >>list to avoid this sort of hostility? How's that working out for ya? >>:-P >> >></flame suit off> >> >> >---- >personally, I like having him post to the list. Most of us blur the >distinction between theory and practice. > >There are some who bait him since he doesn't seem to be capable of >ignoring a taunt. It's sort of obvious who those people are (not >referring to you Jim). > >Craig > > I 2nd that motion .... -- William A. Mahaffey III --------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember, ignorance is bliss, but willful ignorance is LIBERALISM !!!! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051211/7d036d5c/attachment-0005.html>