On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 14:38 +0100, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote: > extras/SRPMS/ipvsadm-1.24-6.src.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#db42a60e) > (and ipvsadm seems to > have a signature unlike all the other packages...) What's worse is that it's a *Red Hat* key... [ignacio at ignacio ~]$ gpg /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY pub 1024D/DB42A60E 1999-09-23 Red Hat, Inc <security at redhat.com> sub 2048g/961630A2 1999-09-23 [ignacio at ignacio ~]$ -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net> http://centos.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051231/5edba766/attachment-0005.sig>