[Centos] Red Hat Legal Targets www.centos.org website content
Francois Caen
frcaen at gmail.comMon Feb 14 20:00:34 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [Centos] Red Hat Legal Targets www.centos.org website content
- Next message: [Centos] USB Flash
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:42:48 -0600, David Thompson <thomas at cs.wisc.edu> wrote: > Not at all. I'm a RHEL-rebuild user because it best meets my needs. > Especially after this nonsense, I wish that my needs were best met by a > different distro. I have no inherent loyalty to RHEL (or Red Hat, for that > matter). I don't think we disagree :-) You and I and most people here are RHEL-rebuild users for various reasons that can be summed up as: it fits our needs. I'm guessing most of us do not want to do the amount of testing and Q/A that the FedoraLegacy folks do on their packages. That would not fit our needs. If the nice pretested preconfigured SRPMs stop coming from RH, RHEL-rebuild projects will have to morph into packaging / backporting projects. I'm not that interested by that paradigm and I'm probably not alone. Francois
- Previous message: [Centos] Red Hat Legal Targets www.centos.org website content
- Next message: [Centos] USB Flash
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list