On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Ted Kaczmarek wrote: > On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 11:43 -0500, John Hinton wrote: > > I'm running bind in a chroot environment. It seems that since the Redhat > > snafu which wrecked bind (yes, I had caching nameserver running as well > > but not anymore) I have been having problem with my slave nameservers > > retrieving updates from the master. > > > > Looking at the zone records, some are owned by root, some are owned by > > named. I'm now confused as to what the ownership should be and what > > permissions should be assigned. Could someone shed some light on this? > > > > Thanks, > > John Hinton > What user are you running named as? > > What user is generating the zone files? > > > Ted > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at caosity.org > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Had the same issue On your DNS slaves you need to change your named.conf file to have directory prefix of slaves file "slaves/somefile.db" Then things works with the slave zone transfers. //Chris