[Centos] partition table Cent4RC1

Sat Feb 19 19:40:03 UTC 2005
Jim Perrin <jperrin at gmail.com>

We've had some issues at work with similar things, and it seems due
more to breakage in ghost than anything else. Kickstart files work
like a champ for making multiple identical machines if that's your
thing, but a good kickstart file can also provide you with a fast
method to rebuild a server should you feel a burning desire to burn it
down and start over.  The 2.6 kernel and specifically SELinux give me
the most warm&fuzzy feelings I've had for a while. I'd not be so quick
to write it off just because some 3rd party (primarily windows
oriented app) doesn't work well.

Just my $0.02
--
Jim Perrin.


On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:52:20 -0800, David Kaupp <dkaupp at ccdsd.org> wrote:
> I just installed CentRC1 on a Dell gx150 as a test. I'm running into the same problem I had with Fc3. I get a partition table error when trying to use ghost8 to create an image.  I was considering putting Cent4 on a ProliantDL380, FC3 installed on that machine but wouldn't boot up,  stuck on Grub. I had FC2 on the Proliant but when FC2 went to the 2.6 kernel, it hung up on the Nash prompt. So I ended up putting WBEL on that machine. I'm still evaluating what OS I want to finally put on there. Looks like Centos3 or a BSD.
> 
>  So my question is, does anyone know if RH will ever put the 2.6 kernel in RHEL3? I'm not getting a lot of warm fuzzies anymore from linux, since the 2.6 kernels have come out. I can hang with CentOS3 until 2008 as long as the kernel stays with something that works. Has anyone tried RHEL4 or Cent4 on a proliant DL380?
> 
> Dave Kaupp
> Catholic Charities, Diocese of San Diego
> http://www.ccdsd.org
> 619-231-2828 x520  619-287-9454 x157
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at caosity.org
> http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>