[Centos] SuperServer 6024H-82R and Centos 3.3

Fri Jan 7 20:03:41 UTC 2005
Joe Polk <listuser at javelinux.com>

I think 102GB. He's pulling the 64bit CD's now.

--
<<JAV>>


---------- Original Message -----------
From: "Geoffrey Galitz" <galitz at uclink.berkeley.edu>
To: CentOS discussion and information list <centos at caosity.org>, CentOS
discussion and information list <centos at caosity.org>
Sent: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:21:02 -0800
Subject: Re: [Centos] SuperServer 6024H-82R and Centos 3.3

> In the event the 64bit install also fails, check
> the diagnostic screens for any clues (Ctrl-Alt-F2,Ctrl-Alt-F3)
> 
> How large is the disk array?
> 
> -geoff
> 
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:16:40 -0400
>   "Joe Polk" <listuser at javelinux.com> wrote:
> >Checking that now. I wasn't aware this was 64bit (read, didn't fully examine
> >the product sheet). :) Client just verified the CPU's are 64bit. We're
> >switching to the x86_64 CD's. Time to download! Not sure that would explain
> >that we are seeing, but worth a shot.
> >
> >--
> ><<JAV>>
> >
> >
> >---------- Original Message -----------
> >From: Jacob Robert Wilkins <jrw at nplus1.net>
> >To: CentOS discussion and information list <centos at caosity.org>
> >Sent: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:03:09 -0500
> >Subject: Re: [Centos] SuperServer 6024H-82R and Centos 3.3
> >
> >> I take back what I said about using that Adaptec chipset. We've used 
> >> the 2015s and the 2010s RAID controlers without problem.
> >> 
> >> Also try the "noapic" option with the installer.
> >> 
> >> Why i368 and not x86_64?
> >> 
> >> jrw
> >> 
> >> On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 03:01:37PM -0400, Joe Polk wrote:
> >> > we're using the i386 version. We just tried acpi=off and got further. It
> >> > bombed trying to  install dev-3.3.12.3-1.centos.0.i386 and stopped. I
advised
> >> > the onsite to try by-passing the new controller and try the onboard.
> >> > 
> >> > --
> >> > <<JAV>>
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > ---------- Original Message -----------
> >> > From: Jacob Robert Wilkins <jrw at nplus1.net>
> >> > To: CentOS discussion and information list <centos at caosity.org>
> >> > Sent: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:21:02 -0500
> >> > Subject: Re: [Centos] SuperServer 6024H-82R and Centos 3.3
> >> > 
> >> > > That is an EM64T chipset. Are you installing the i386 version of 
> >> > > CentOS, or the x86_64 version. How much ram is in it?
> >> > > 
> >> > > jrw
> >> > > 
> >> > > On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 02:08:53PM -0400, Joe Polk wrote:
> >> > > > I know this is a long shot, but does anyone have any familiarity
with this
> >> > > > server? It uses the Super X6DH8-G2 motherboard. Currently, we've
added an
> >> > > > Adaptec 2120S Ultra320 RAID PCI Controller Card to get RAID 5
> >capability. The
> >> > > > installation bombs and from what I can tell it looks like we're
> >getting SCSI
> >> > > > resets or the controller is going offline maybe. Any ideas would be
> >greatly
> >> > > > appreciated.
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > CentOS mailing list
> >> > > CentOS at caosity.org
> >> > > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >> > ------- End of Original Message -------
> >> > 
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > CentOS mailing list
> >> > CentOS at caosity.org
> >> > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CentOS mailing list
> >> CentOS at caosity.org
> >> http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >------- End of Original Message -------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >CentOS mailing list
> >CentOS at caosity.org
> >http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Geoff Galitz
> Chemistry Research Computing, UC Berkeley
> galitz at berkeley.edu
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at caosity.org
> http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
------- End of Original Message -------