On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 12:46 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On Fri, January 21, 2005 12:19 pm, Troy Engel said: > > Thanks for the URL, Donovan. Ok this really is not good, is it still the > > licensing snafu/issue with MySQL 4.x that Redhat doesn't like? Something > > about a change regarding to linking to 4.x libs and the LGPL I remember > > reading... > > > > Increasing we're having to hybrid all our servers (run the mysql client > > RPMS for 3.x, but server binaries for 4.0 over in /usr/local/) for more > > and more projects that need the 4.0 features. I've also read that with > > 4.1 server binaries, the 3.x client apps will no longer work? > > > > sigh. They're killin us out here in the trenches... > > > > -te > > > The mysql in 4.0beta is indeed 3.23.58, but there is now a mysql-4.1.9 in > rawhide, so it seems that they have worked out the licensing issues. > > It is possible that 4.1.x can be released in RHEL 4 (and so in CentOS-4 as > well). If it is not, I'll build a mysql-4 and make it an extras or > contrib build for CentOS-4 final ... because I want to use the new > administrator and it is only for mysql-4. > > > > donavan nelson wrote: > >> > >> I haven't seen an update one the mysql4 issues for RH. You and everyone > >> else can check current package releases here: > >> > >> mysql is the 3.whatever release in CentOS4b2 > >> > >> http://beta.centos.org/centos/4.0beta/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/ > > > > -- > > Troy Engel | Systems Engineer > > Fluid, Inc | http://www.fluid.com > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS at caosity.org > > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > Wondering if this has something to do with AB coming after people for licensing revenue, in violation of the mysql EULA. After seeing a buddy of mine's firm get nailed for 1.5 million dollars I learned at his firms expense. Ted