[CentOS] Correlation with LNAELV ....

William A. Mahaffey III wam at HiWAAY.net
Sun Jul 3 19:45:30 UTC 2005


Johnny Hughes wrote:

>On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 11:38 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
>  
>
>>.... I am new to this list (got referred here from the fedora list, COLD 
>>....) and have a few questions. I poked around CentOS.org & couldn't 
>>figure these out, so here goes:
>>    
>>
>
><snip>
>
>  
>
>>2. Does CentOS plan to branch permanently away from LNAELV distribution, 
>>or periodically re-sync ?
>>    
>>
>
>Oh ... so we are totally synced (pretty much the maximum allowed by
>trademark law) ... and we remain that way (at least in the base and
>updates repos) all the time.  
>
>If you compare the centos-announce list:
>
>http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/
>
>with the RHEL-4 errata list:
>
>https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel4as-errata.html
>
>You will see that security updates are done, usually within 24 hours, of
>any security release upstream.
>
>When the Quarterly updates are done (now 2-4 times a year), we release
>the Security updates (RHSAs) immediately ... the Re-spinning of the ISOs
>usually takes 1-2 weeks to totally test out and release.
>  
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>CentOS mailing list
>CentOS at centos.org
>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>  
>


This makes the most sense, leveraging on LNAELV AMAP, but I was unclear 
from reading the 4.n blurb on the website, thanks.

-- 
	William A. Mahaffey III
---------------------------------------------------------------------
	Remember, ignorance is bliss, but
	willful ignorance is LIBERALISM !!!!

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050703/d71b25b5/attachment.html>


More information about the CentOS mailing list