[CentOS] Re: 4g/4g
Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith@ieee.org>
thebs413 at earthlink.netWed Jul 20 14:35:41 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: 4g/4g
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: 4g/4g
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
From: Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> > You sure about that? It's my understanding that the 4g/4g patch was > something that RH wanted to get into the mainline kernel but which > was never accepted, so they dropped it. Hmmm, maybe I haven't built from a stock kernel in a long time. ;-> All I know is that I've seen it in several other distros. I thought the whole purpose of the 4Gi/4Gi model was to give a support/performance point between the 1Gi/3Gi and full 64GiB model. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: 4g/4g
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: 4g/4g
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list