[CentOS] Re: Big thanks for supporting i586 type machines. -- isn't K6 = i686?
Bryan J. Smith
b.j.smith at ieee.orgSat Jul 30 22:25:52 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Big thanks for supporting i586 type machines.
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Big thanks for supporting i586 type machines. -- isn't K6 = i686?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 17:55 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: > While I know that, technically, the only i586 machines are the Pentium and > Pentium MMX, it is still nice that I can use some headless AMD K6/2 machines > I have lying around for CentOS 4. Many thanks for the effort expended to get > that working. The AMD K6-2+ don't run the i686 version? I was fairly certain the Nx686 core (K6) was a 3-issue, superscalar i686 ISA compatible ALU + non-pipelined AMD x87 FPU slapped on? In fact, I thought the primary difference between the Nx586 core and the Nx686 core was the move from i386/486 ISA (i386 in early Nx586, i486 in the latter K5s as it's TLB was made fully i486 ISA compatible) to i686 (all K6 units)? They should run i686 ISA code the last time I checked. -- Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith at ieee.org http://thebs413.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- It is mathematically impossible for someone who makes more than you to be anything but richer than you. Any tax rate that penalizes them will also penalize you similarly (to those below you, and then below them). This is why someone who makes more than you always gets at least the same, if not a bigger, tax cut. Otherwise is impossible.
- Previous message: [CentOS] Big thanks for supporting i586 type machines.
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Big thanks for supporting i586 type machines. -- isn't K6 = i686?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list