Bryan J. Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 09:34 -0400, Ugo Bellavance wrote: > >>I was using Fedora Core 4 for a few weeks, but it was unstable and >>had trouble reading some of my DVD drives and other issues. > > Consider sticking with Fedora Core 3. Whats wrong with CentOS4 that he has just installed ? The orignal post was about sources/ repositories for CentOS4, and not whats wrong with FC4. Can we atleast try and keep some sort of thread sanity here ? If you have nothing to say about the issues raied in the original post, please dont. If you have an opinion on something that might be related from an outside angle - feel free to start a new thread ( so that people with no interest can safely ignore it ). > I'm holding off on Fedora Core 4 adoption, just like I did Fedora Core > 2. I really wish Red Hat would go back to the revisioning model for the > community Linux, so people are "warned" when you basically get a ".0" > release. > Thats why CentOS exists. If you dont want a bleeding edge, faster moving distro : you have a choice. Use CentOS. Feel free to download from any of the mirrors listed at : http://www.centos.org/mirrors/ - KB -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ GnuPG Public Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc