On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 16:56, Peter Farrow wrote: > >You use 'chosen' above as to suggest that there are equivalent > >alternatives. Are there - for an organization that lives > >and dies by the scheduling features and shared folders in exchange? > > Samsung Contact, and Open exchange are two very capable alternatives that work natively with outlook, i.e. outlook thinks it has an exchange server at the other end... Do these require extra client-side software installed on every machine? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com