On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 14:40 -0600, Greg Knaddison wrote: > On 7/7/05, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: ... > > You want to try FC3 src.rpm's first - they are more likely to get you a > > better-fit. > > > > But sometimes its just not that simple, eg. Evolution. To get the latest > > / greatest - you are looking to, pretty much, rebuild the entire gnome > > platform and move to 2.10 So it seems. Had a shot at building FC4 evolution and it turned into way more packages than I really wanted to replace to get an updated evolution. Gave up after about 6 rounds of building/installing/building-new-deps/installing and reverted to CentOS4 and/or FC3 evolution RPMS and dependencies, as documented elsewhere in the thread. > > > > ( you could do the garnome way if you like... not much fun, if its a > > simple drop in install you want ) > > > > I realize I asked a kind of ridiculous question - but was curious if > there were a good answer - seems not. Especially as FC3 goes EOL in a > few months... Well, a more stable (IMHO and experience) FC3-rebuilt set of evolution RPMS might be an intermediate answer until a better solution comes from upstream. Still think it might be a candidate for centosplus. Phil P.S. FC3 evolution rebuild is working well for me on x86_64 as well as i386 arch.