[CentOS] Dual booting centos 4.1 and Solaris 10 express build 15

Fri Jul 8 11:59:48 UTC 2005
Anand Pandey <pandey.anand at gmail.com>

Try this, unless you have forgot to install the Solaaris boot loader
on your second hard drive. Yes this was a problem for mee too, the new
Solaris Grub fails to recognize ext3 partitions.

--Anand

title Solaris 10
       root (hd1,0)
       chainloader +1
title Windows xp
       rootnoverify (hd0,0)
       chainloader +1

On 7/7/05, mohamed yusuf <myusuf32 at yahoo.ca> wrote:
> 
> --- Aleksandar Milivojevic <alex at milivojevic.org>
> wrote:
> 
> > mohamed yusuf wrote:
> > > I have been trying to multiboot centos 4.1 and the
> > > current solaris express build 15. I have two hard
> > > drive s, the first one ( hd0 ) devoted to CentOS
> > 4.1
> > > and windows xp (no problems). The second drive
> > (hd1)
> > > for Solaris 10 only. I tried to boot solaris from
> > > CentOS grub and got the following error messages:
> > >
> > > Booting Solaris 10
> > > root(hd1,0)
> > > Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0Xbf
> > > kernel /platform/i86pc/multiboot
> > > Error 17: can not mount  selected partition
> > > press any key to continue....
> >
> > Grub knows how to read BSD UFS type of file system,
> > but I'm not sure
> > about Solaris file system.  Solaris UFS is basically
> > BSD UFS with some
> > extra stuff.  You said you were able to boot it
> > before.  Some of the
> > reasons for failure could be:
> >
> >   - wrong partition type
> >   - logging enabled on Solaris UFS
> >   - different version of Solaris UFS
> >   - Solaris kernel stored outside of BIOS
> > addressable disk area
> >
> > Also, I'm not sure if you want to have makeactive
> > and chainloader
> > options if Grub is loading kernel directly.
> 
> I have taken out makeactive  and chainloader + no
> success
> 
> > One thing to check is how disk is organized.  I
> > remember that Solaris
> > likes to have an partition for itself, install
> > Solaris disklabel onto
> > it, and then sub-partition it into 8 partitions (so
> > basically you get
> > partitions inside partitions, something like
> > extended partition in
> > DOS/Windows).  Somehow I doubt Grub would be able to
> > read that.
> 
> > If you simply can't make Grub to mount Solaris
> > partition, and load the
> > kernel, your best bet would be installing Solaris
> > boot loader onto first
> > partition of second disk, and using similar
> > configuration as for booting
> > Windows XP.  Something along the lines:
> 
> I installed solaris boot loader on it own pratition (
> hd1,0)and got the same result. The only thing I have
> not tried is booting CentOs from Solaris boot loader (
> reverse)
> 
> > title Solaris 10
> >     rootnoverify (hd1,0)
> >     chainloader +1
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS at centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
> 
> Thanks Aleksandar
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>