I like it! I like it! -mj- Ajay wrote: > Faced the cross-dependency problem when trying to install 1.9.113 on > CentOS4-i386. > > After fooling around for sometime I downloaded and installed "smart" > tool from > http://smartpm.org. Then dumped freedesktop and redhat menu RPMS from > "desktop > integration" folder to "RPMS" folder and ran "smart install *". That did > the > job nicely > > Rgds > > Ajay > > > > > > Quoting Mark Jarvis <mark.jarvis at pvmail.maricopa.edu>: > > >> >> I have the -104 download tucked away in my download directory--I'll take >> a look at it. >> >> Thanks for the tip! >> >> -mj- >> >> Bryan J. Smith wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 22:36 -0700, Mark Jarvis wrote: >>> >>>> I immediately ran into problems-- >>>> 1) The installation instructions were for OO 1.x. >>>> 2) The download appears to be source RPMs. >>> >>> >>> >>> I downloaded the version 1.9.104 (May 20th) binary RPMs for i386. >>> Build system on the RPMs is reported as up-smb2.germany.sun.com. >>> >>> Now I'm runing these binaries on Fedora Core 3 x86-64 no less. >>> It's a stock x86-64 install, except I do manually swap out Firefox >>> x86-64 for Firefox i386 (so all my i386 plug-ins work). >>> >>> So I'd say if a "plain Jane" Fedora Core 3 install (with limited Fedora >>> Extras / RPM.Livna.ORG packages) work, I don't see why it won't on >>> CentOS 4. >>> >>> >>>> Has anyone added OO1.9.113 to CentOS? >>> >>> >>> >>> I would assume anything that runs on Fedora Core 3 would run on CentOS 4 >>> without issue. CentOS 3 might be an issue though. >>> >>> As far as the source RPMs, maybe those are included because you need to >>> build it from source. It could be a Java Runtime Engine (JRE) >>> requirement that might be taken out of newer builds in favor of a GPL >>> Java stack like GCJ. I'm running Sun JRE 1.5.0_02 (i586 I believe) on >>> my x86-64 system. >>> >>> But the RPMs didn't list them as a dependency. In fact, I want to say >>> it was actually installed with the RPMs. Now thinking back, it might >>> have installed Java with the RPMs in a single ".sh" file download and >>> subsequent run. >>> >>> That might explain it the best, why I had no problems. >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >