On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 09:54 -0500, Bryan J. Smith wrote: > At this point, you're hopelessly lost. I can keep talking about it, but > you won't get it until you have some "technical background." I hope you don't take that as an insult (I know you will though). You didn't know what a KDC is, so you aren't familiar with how ADS works, which is a _core_component_ to Samba 3.0's functionality. Microsoft is the "king of buy/reuse/non-development," and ADS is little more than the NT SAM stored with LDAP, with a sprawling amount of (poorly designed IMHO) schema with MS-centric Kerberos for authentication. Microsoft was under contractual obligation with MIT to disclose their Kerberos modifications, and even then they sat on it for 2 years, but that it is now well documented and other interfaces reverse engineered from it. The kicker is the sprawling MS LDAP schema, and the interfaces used on the Windows side -- that's a "moving target" reverse engineering issue that will probably _never_ be fully supported. Now I'm going to take the rest of the day and enjoy my wife, hence why I won't follow-up on any more questions. If anyone needs me for further discussion that is clearly getting "OT" for this list, you can contact me off-list or, better yet, hire me as an independent architect for your organization. ;-> -- Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith at ieee.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- It is mathematically impossible for someone who makes more than you to be anything but richer than you. Any tax rate that penalizes them will also penalize you similarly (to those below you, and then below them). Linear algebra, let alone differential calculus or even ele- mentary concepts of limits, is mutually exclusive with US journalism. So forget even attempting to explain how tax cuts work. ;->