Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > Ok, stop. > Now, reread the original post. The thing was BOOTING > without the keyboard; it's NOT a BIOS problem. It was > getting through the Linux kernel boot. > John Murray posted the correct response. > Is it too much for people (not just Bryan) to actually read > the original post? My apologies. I should have read the original post in that thread, you are indeed correct. As far as the k3b thread, I was responding to the "added information" (i.e., "don't search for alternative"). If people wouldn't add such information, I wouldn't have to say why you might want to. k3b doesn't always use the mode I want, and I've run into serious issues with compatibility in a few cases. Same deal anytime someone makes an inaccurate comment about Red Hat, etc... Sorry I like to explain why such assumptions might not want to go unnoticed and unanswered. Now I noted you didn't single me out in this one (although you did quote me and no one else), but you did in the k3b thread. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org Sent from Yahoo Mail (please excuse any missing headers)