On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 16:13, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 14:22, Bryan J. Smith wrote: > > > I know, but I don't want to manage users on 2 servers... > > > What helps with that? Winbind? > > > > PREABMLE: The fact that you have chosen Exchange 2000 means > > you are _stuck_ with Active Directory Services (ADS). Unless > > you want to chuck Exchange, you are _stuck_ with keeping your > > ADS. > > You use 'chosen' above as to suggest that there are equivalent > alternatives. Are there - for an organization that lives > and dies by the scheduling features and shared folders in exchange? Like the ones listed here? http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8333 Note: I have not used any of these but they appear to address most functions currently available via the windows alternative. -- Scot L. Harris webid at cfl.rr.com If God had wanted us to be concerned for the plight of the toads, he would have made them cute and furry. -- Dave Barry