[CentOS] Re: Reboots -- LSB 2.1 Core Generic Section 8.5
Rodrigo Barbosa
rodrigob at suespammers.orgFri Jun 3 07:43:07 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Reboots -- LSB 2.1 Core Generic Section 8.5
- Next message: Runlevel document found: I was wrong (Was: [CentOS] Re: Reboots -- LSB 2.1 Core Generic Section 8.5)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 02:13:30AM -0500, Bryan J. Smith wrote: > I'm just > trying to show why the run-levels are the same as Red Hat, because of > the lineage. Nothing more. Agreed. > God I'm sorry I even pointed out some of this stuff. I'm sorry I > crossed you. You didn't crossed me. Maybe it is because it is late here, and english is not my primary language. I'm sorry if I gave you that impression. I just get repetitive sometimes, due to lack of better language tools. > The point is that every BSD or AT&T flavor I've seen has at least one, > if not both. From there, I can start tracing how the system boots, > etc... Systems vary wildly, so only by tracing the full boot can you be > sure. Perfect. I completely agree with you about this init system issue. Best Regards, - -- Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at suespammers.org> "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCoAoLpdyWzQ5b5ckRAsgCAJ0ZqwiRl3HSwN0oGol1f74nDg/SaQCcDc3y wyG9bBKuIQqS8uMuyZDVUKE= =Dn4s -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Reboots -- LSB 2.1 Core Generic Section 8.5
- Next message: Runlevel document found: I was wrong (Was: [CentOS] Re: Reboots -- LSB 2.1 Core Generic Section 8.5)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list