[CentOS] Vote For CentOS :)
Steve Huff
shuff at vecna.orgFri Jun 3 14:46:54 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Vote For CentOS :)
- Next message: [CentOS] Vote For CentOS :)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Jun 3, 2005, at 10:36 AM, Simon Perreault wrote: > That's what I was referring to by "community". i may be misinterpreting your statements, but you seem to be dismissing the "community" as something of little importance and its creation and maintenance as a trivial task. i believe you are mistaken. > I agree with you that resolving these bugs in CentOS creates > additional value > for CentOS, and makes CentOS more of a fork rather than a rebranding. > However > these bugs should also be reported to Red Hat. i don't see anything in the CentOS bugzilla that precludes those bugs being reported to Red Hat. are you saying that CentOS developers should *not* work on those bugs, and should instead wait for Red Hat to address them? if so, why? -steve --- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v
- Previous message: [CentOS] Vote For CentOS :)
- Next message: [CentOS] Vote For CentOS :)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list