[CentOS] A questiong about replacing my failing drive
Joshua Baker-LePain
jlb17 at duke.eduTue Jun 14 20:24:32 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] A questiong about replacing my failing drive
- Next message: [CentOS] A questiong about replacing my failing drive
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 at 3:10pm, Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith at ieee.org> wrote > From: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17 at duke.edu> > > > Yes, I've pointed out on official Red Hat mailing lists that 2 is false > > due (at least) to the issue of backing up ACLs (use star they say -- no > > thanks, > > Well, Red Hat has shipped Jorg's "star" in RHL8 on-ward to address > this. According to the version number on RHEL4's version of star (yes, I know you can't always go by that) and the datestamps at <ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/star/alpha/>, RHEL4's star is from 9/13/2003(!!). The main patching I see in the .spec file is selinux related (as one would expect). Thus, according to the revision history at the ftp site above, RHEL4's star has rudimentary incremental backup support and *no* incremental restore support. Not exactly enterprise software, IMHO. -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University
- Previous message: [CentOS] A questiong about replacing my failing drive
- Next message: [CentOS] A questiong about replacing my failing drive
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list