[CentOS] [OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0 -> 4.1 update failing
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comSat Jun 25 17:02:38 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] [OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0 -> 4.1 update failing
- Next message: [CentOS] [OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0 -> 4.1 update failing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 01:27, Bryan J. Smith wrote: > But at this point, let's just forget this whole thread because it's > obvious that you're not interested in hearing me out, just hearing > yourself out. Some real-world benchmark numbers would make the case more convincing. Does anyone have some? I'm particularly interested in anything with AMD vs. IBM's 64-bit xeon boxes. Also, on the hardware topic: are there differences in NICs in working with 801.q VLANs? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] [OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0 -> 4.1 update failing
- Next message: [CentOS] [OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0 -> 4.1 update failing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list