[CentOS] [OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0-> 4.1 update failing
Feizhou
feizhou at graffiti.netWed Jun 29 03:46:31 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] [OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0-> 4.1 update failing
- Next message: [CentOS] [OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0-> 4.1 update failing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert Hanson wrote: > Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith at ieee.org> > -}Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 10:29 AM > -}If you deploy servers with more than 1GB of RAM, and > -}definitely more than 4GB of RAM, you should be aware > -}of what limitations there are with Intel solutions. > -} > -}That's what this was about. > -}Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org > > interesting, maybe i missed something then as i have been following most of > the thread(s) yet... > > what _practical_ knowledge are we or were we supposed to have gained in > terms of CentOS, security, and or anything else please? Whether it is possible to get direct addressing above 1G, 4G and on what hardware.
- Previous message: [CentOS] [OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0-> 4.1 update failing
- Next message: [CentOS] [OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0-> 4.1 update failing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list