On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 17:16 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 17:03, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 17:48 -0400, William Warren wrote: > > > I am wondering what the list's opinion is on the Apple to Intel > > > switch. This is going to put a slick desktop that runs on top of > > > BSD directly into the mainstream. What does this hold for Linux > > > in general, Linux on the desktop..and microsoft. > > > > Yawn. Apple in their right mind would never allow OS X to run on > > commodity hardware. It may have an Intel chip in it, but it's still not > > a PC. > > So how long will it take for someone to add Mac emulation to Xen, > VMware, VirtualPC, etc. so OS X won't know its running on > commodity hardware? Not very long I'd imagine. Look at PearPC as it is, and realize that they won't have to do processor emulation anymore. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net> http://centos.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050607/7e98be33/attachment-0005.sig>