On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 10:27:09AM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > Yes I've already been bitten by the symlink still going to 3.4 instead > of 3.5, but who'd expect httpd being newer in 3.4 than in 3.5? > > Is that an error? Should that be filed as a bug? > > 3.4: httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2 (and it's in base, not updates) > 3.5: httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.1 in 3.5 it is httpd-2.0.46-46.ent.centos.1 (release version is 46 not 44). Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050613/c42d1186/attachment-0005.sig>