Quoting Feizhou <feizhou at graffiti.net>: > Nothing beats grub's ability to let you roam around the filesystem to > find out just what kernels were installed and what their > configuration parameters were and then load a kernel and its > parameters on the spot. I agree that Grub is more featurefull boot loader with many nice options. However, for my servers I simply want them to boot without human intervention. Grub fails to do that more often than LILO. Grub needs extra work to get it right on my servers (that have mirrored disks). I don't care about nice graphical menu (there's nobody in server room to watch it). I don't care about Grub's CLI (there's nobody in server room in the middle of the night to use it). I just want system to boot every time. For dedicated Linux servers, LILO works perfectly, out of the box, no additional work required. Those boxes are simple to boot, no fancy stuff in boot loader config files. Grub is better when you have "complicated boot configuraion" box. And "complicated boot configuration" boxes are usually desktops and laptops, especially those in hands of developers. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.