[CentOS] KPPP: why root?

On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 08:10 -0400, Mark Weaver wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I'm wondering about something that seems a bit odd. I've setup a CentOS 
> 4 box for a client that is "still" using dial-up and to activate the 
> connection appears to require root privileges. Why is this?
> 
> The reason Linux was loaded on this box was to provide a very functional 
> box that could be easily locked down so when the cat was away the mice 
> couldn't play, however, if the mice need root access to activate the 
> dial-up connection this really defeats the purpose.
> 
> Whats up with Kppp needing root access?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Mark

KPPP has required a root password forever :)

I don't know if this works, but here it is:

http://www.linuxgazette.com/node/3759


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050518/faacc648/attachment-0001.sig>