[CentOS] Re: CentOS and SL, together? -- attributing statements to me (that I didn't make)
Dag Wieers
dag at wieers.comSun May 29 22:36:35 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: CentOS and SL, together? -- attributing statements to me (that I didn't make)
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: CentOS and SL, together? -- attributing statements to me (that I didn't make)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 29 May 2005, Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith at ieee.org> wrote: > This is what I really _hate_ about these lists. All of the sudden, _anything_ > negative said by _anyone_ in a thread is attributed only to me -- and I'm the > focal point for 100% of what people don't like. > > REGARDLESS IF I SAID IT OR NOT! 100% GETS PUT ON MY NAME! Bryan, stop generalising and dramatising. It's not you against the world. Much of the commotion is related to the manner you communicate and interprete what people say, regardless of some good points you make. Your above statement is a perfect example of that. BTW I'm not saying this to attack you, but to help you. I tried being diplomatic in private and in public, but it did not help much. -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: CentOS and SL, together? -- attributing statements to me (that I didn't make)
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: CentOS and SL, together? -- attributing statements to me (that I didn't make)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list