I don’t understand why ".." isn’t working the same way for "ls" and "cd" when inside a symbolic link. The reason I ask is that I made a link to a directory with some scripts that saves output in "../output.txt" and I could not find the output until I found that ".." isn’t the directory you see when you do a $pwd. I solved the problem by making a directory and then make a link to each script in there. I would just like to know: 1) if there is a good reason to this behaviour. 2) if there is a rule, so you know when ".." is level up from $ pwd and when it is one level up from the link target. 3) if there is an alternativ way to point to the parent directory. Personally I can't see why you would ever need ".." to be one level up from the link target. Example: $ ln -s /home link_to_home; cd link_to_home $ ls .. bin dev home lib misc $ cd ..;ls link_to_home Have a nice weekend Ulrik -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by OpenProtect(http://www.openprotect.com), and is believed to be clean.