Thanks Ryan, I have already posted a reply while you were typing your... go take a look...... P. Ryan Sweet wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2005, Peter Farrow wrote: > >> You may of course believe what you like....... > > > M. Farrow, > > I am quite convinced that M. Baker-LePain is not discussing matters of > belief, but of fact (fact that was on Intel's roadmap two years ago > and has been a released product for nine months). Please it is > preferable if you don't begin arguments, but if you choose to have an > argument at least start with a remotely tenable position. > > http://www.intel.com/products/processor/xeon/index.htm > > It is true that the original xeons were 32bit cpus, but Intel chose to > keep the Xeon name for its EM64T technology. > > regards, > -Ryan > >> >> Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: >> >>>> "based on the same x86_64 technology that AMD introduced with their >>>> Opterons." >>> >>> >>> If you didn't top post, you wouldn't have to re-type my quote. >> > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos