[CentOS] Re: centos] Hewlett Packard Server support packs

Wed May 11 23:59:46 UTC 2005
Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com>

On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 09:46 +1000, John Newbigin wrote:
> I am pretty sure that they are shell scripts and they are looking for 
> strings in /etc/redhat-release
> 
> Can someone with RHEL post a real /etc/redhat-release for us too look at.
> 
> IMHO, CentOS should provide a RedHat looking redhat-release and a centos 
> specific centos-release.
> 
> John.
> 

Red Hat, Inc. is not at all happy with CentOS providing a RedHat
looking /etc/redhat-release.  I wanted to do that, but I was told that
would be a big no-no :(

I also thought about (and tested) 2 lines (a RHEL one and a CentOS
one) ... that also didn't look good to the legal world ... sorry.

Things we could do (and get away with) in CentOS-2 and CentOS-3 are
drawing the attention of the upstream provider in CentOS-4.  I guess a
two week turn around got their attention on release :)

> R P Herrold wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 11 May 2005, Chris Hammond wrote:
> > 
> >> I am trying to install the HP PSP on a CentOS 3.4 server but it keeps 
> >> telling me, only on certain rpms mind you,
> >> that the OS is not supported.  I have made the modifications to 
> >> redhat-release which cleared up some of the initial
> >> errors I was having but not all.  Where else would the rpms be getting 
> >> the OS info from?  Better yet, has anyone
> >> managed to get the Linux PSP to install on a CentOS box?
> > 
> > 
> > almost certainly it is looking for certain strings which it is not 
> > finding.  strace is your friend
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050511/e467a4a3/attachment-0005.sig>