Hi Jonathan! Just to preface: the statements here and in my original post are my opinion only and based on what I've seen and opinions/observations of others. My fiance is involved in the graphics community; primarily "pixelling". She runs hosting for other folks in the community and is a member of many boards and forums. There are dozens of these folks hosting and hawking their wares on sites all over, backended primarily by Cpanel. In talking to these folks, the Cpanel complaint stream is almost endless. Generally, the issues are with stablility (quite often while trying to work with their sites, they end up staring at Cpanel generated error pages), and with things going missing. Files being lost or mangled, that sort of thing... Anyone who has moved to my fiance's hosting simply loves DirectAdmin, the functionality and stability. From an admin point of view, we love it to. IMHO, the bottom line is stability and ease in "getting the job done" which DA does quite nicely for us. Hope this clears things a bit! cya, TR On Friday 20 May 2005 18:48, Jonathan wrote: > >If you have a revenue stream, I wholeheartedly recommend looking at this > >product. It really leaves Cpanel and the likes in the dust. > > What do you base that statement on for directadmin.com? > > I'd really like to hear more about your thoughts on the subject here, as > I have used all of these control panels (except VHCS, which looks > interesting), and found directadmin kind of so-so. > > J > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos