[CentOS] SELinux threads, cynicism, one-upmanship, etc.
me at prestoncrawford.com
Sat Nov 19 01:52:38 UTC 2005
> On Thursday 17 November 2005 18:12, Chris Mauritz wrote:
>> Lamar Owen wrote:
>> >After reading through the various SELinux threads, I really became
>> >perturbed. I mean, really quite perturbed.
>> If you get perturbed over something so trivial, perhaps it's time to
>> re-examine your priorities in life. 8-)
> Security is not trivial. Or do you want your server or workstation to
He never said security was trivial. He was speaking about the discussion
and its relative weight. Why can't you separate it?
> Security is never trivial.
Yes, we know.
> When I have to explain to an astronomer that that once in a lifetime radio
> followup to a gamma ray burst was wiped out because I was too lazy to
> properly secure the system, I won't think it was trivial.
> The 'security is trivial' mindset is why we have Windows.
More information about the CentOS