[CentOS] Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
Mark Sargent
powderkeg at snow.email.ne.jpWed Nov 30 12:16:17 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 9, Issue 16
- Next message: [CentOS] Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi All, whilst not being an expert on iptables, the below ouput of iptables -L seems too insecure to me. Does anyone agree.? Perhaps I'm not understanding it as well as I think I am.? Please give your thoughts on this. Cheers. Mark Sargent. [root at localhost racket]# iptables -L Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination RH-Firewall-1-INPUT all -- anywhere anywhere Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination RH-Firewall-1-INPUT all -- anywhere anywhere Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain RH-Firewall-1-INPUT (2 references) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT icmp -- anywhere anywhere icmp any ACCEPT ipv6-crypt-- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT ipv6-auth-- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT udp -- anywhere 224.0.0.251 udp dpt:5353 ACCEPT udp -- anywhere anywhere udp dpt:ipp ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED REJECT all -- anywhere anywhere reject-with icmp-host-prohibited You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/root
- Previous message: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 9, Issue 16
- Next message: [CentOS] Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list