[CentOS] Putting nat routing into place permanently? -- /etc/rc.d/rc.local v. /etc/init.d/custom scripts
Peter Farrow
peter at farrows.orgMon Nov 7 10:33:07 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Putting nat routing into place permanently? -- /etc/rc.d/rc.local v. /etc/init.d/custom scripts
- Next message: [CentOS] Putting nat routing into place permanently? -- /etc/rc.d/rc.local v. /etc/init.d/custom scripts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'm Not getting snippy, Brian denied quite definately that no such comment was posted, I merely point out to him that such a comment was made, as he seemed not to have noticed it while compiling a "war and peace" style reply of epic proportions.... ;-) P. Preston Crawford wrote: >>Check the archives, >> >>a post was mde saying that it was explicitly not the right way to do it >>in rc.local... >> >>Hence my comment >> >>P. >> >> >> > >I'm hoping this doesn't get nit-picky and petty. I asked for the canonical >way to do it. Interpret this as you wish. I see that to mean, "how would a >Red Hat engineer put that into place". I got my answer, I believe. This >debate about alternatives is great, but there's no need for anyone to get >snippy. > >Preston > >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS at centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > >
- Previous message: [CentOS] Putting nat routing into place permanently? -- /etc/rc.d/rc.local v. /etc/init.d/custom scripts
- Next message: [CentOS] Putting nat routing into place permanently? -- /etc/rc.d/rc.local v. /etc/init.d/custom scripts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list