[CentOS] Re: OpenFiler (and back on-topic) -- WAS: Filers, filesystems, etc.
Josh Kelley
joshkel at gmail.comWed Nov 9 19:09:06 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: OpenFiler (and back on-topic) -- WAS: Filers, filesystems, etc.
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: OpenFiler (and back on-topic) -- WAS: Filers, filesystems, etc.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 11/9/05, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > because this got asked offlist, right away..... SnapShots on Lvm2 are > still kinda broken - the results you achieve are never predicatable. How broken? Any details? I found a few comments online that multiple snapshots may not work or that snapshotting can be memory intensive; will LVM2 snapshots work at all, or am I better off just avoiding them for now? Josh Kelley
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: OpenFiler (and back on-topic) -- WAS: Filers, filesystems, etc.
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: OpenFiler (and back on-topic) -- WAS: Filers, filesystems, etc.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list