[CentOS] SELinux threads, cynicism, one-upmanship, etc.
Preston Crawford
me at prestoncrawford.comSat Nov 19 01:52:38 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] SELinux threads, cynicism, one-upmanship, etc.
- Next message: [CentOS] SELinux threads, cynicism, one-upmanship, etc.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> On Thursday 17 November 2005 18:12, Chris Mauritz wrote: >> Lamar Owen wrote: >> >After reading through the various SELinux threads, I really became >> quite >> >perturbed. I mean, really quite perturbed. > >> If you get perturbed over something so trivial, perhaps it's time to >> re-examine your priorities in life. 8-) > > Security is not trivial. Or do you want your server or workstation to > become He never said security was trivial. He was speaking about the discussion and its relative weight. Why can't you separate it? > Security is never trivial. Yes, we know. > When I have to explain to an astronomer that that once in a lifetime radio > followup to a gamma ray burst was wiped out because I was too lazy to > properly secure the system, I won't think it was trivial. Preach ON!!! > The 'security is trivial' mindset is why we have Windows. AMEN!! Preston
- Previous message: [CentOS] SELinux threads, cynicism, one-upmanship, etc.
- Next message: [CentOS] SELinux threads, cynicism, one-upmanship, etc.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list