[CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
ivazquez at ivazquez.netWed Nov 30 15:43:50 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Next message: [CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 16:38 +0100, Ulrik S. Kofod wrote: > great! now I got all annoyed for nothing ;) Don't worry, that's not a rare occurrence here. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net> http://centos.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051130/29944dcd/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Next message: [CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list