[CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
Brian T. Brunner
brian.t.brunner at gai-tronics.comWed Nov 30 17:03:15 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Next message: [CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> mail-lists at karan.org 11/30/05 11:57AM >>> Brian T. Brunner wrote: > The question remains unanswered: WHY was LILO removed? You seem to have missed the post where I highlighted the fact that it has not been removed. ***Yes, the "removed" was only virtual (making it invisible unless you have ***knowledge from elsewhere) not surgical. > > The question was "Hey, REDHAT, *WHY*?" you also seem to have the wrong forum for that question, please contact redhat at one of the following ***Anybody here know of a reason? Brian Brunner brian.t.brunner at gai-tronics.com (610)796-5838 ******************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated
- Previous message: [CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Next message: [CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list