Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote: > > Errr... you mean Java, not JavaScript, right? > > Yup, I noticed same thing too. Some simple demo applets worked OK > (hey I got > nice looking fractal and my browser survived), other more complex > would make > browser to instantly crash. Probably going to disable plugin. Also, > probably > the reason jpackage folks disabled it in the spec file (or maybe Sun > does not > even ship it for the very same reasons)... > Yep.. java, not javascript. Just was perusing Dag's site, and I don't even see a "late" version of i-386 firefox. Think the latest version was less than 1, or maybe 1.0x-something. From a previous post some time back on the same thread, it would appear to me that the upstream provider either should drop the x86-64 version of firefox and go to the 386 version. I don't know of any reason anyone would *need* the 64-bit version.... -- Snowman