Bryan J. Smith wrote: > Has nothing to do with YUM. > It has to do with RPM. R P Herrold got mid-anal on BS: > buzz -- wrong - thanks for playing -- It has to do with the > rpm packager's design decisions; nothing more, nothing less > rpm did just what it was told to do. Umm, isn't that what I said? The RPM is built to either replace an existing config (renaming the existing as .rpmsave) or put out a copy of a new config (not touching the existing, calling the new .rpmnew). I'm kinda confused on how I was "wrong"??? -- Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org | (please excuse any http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)