[CentOS] Which imapd?
Chris Mauritz
chrism at imntv.comMon Oct 24 16:17:31 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Which imapd?
- Next message: [CentOS] Which imapd?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Heinlein wrote: >> Yes, I did head to head comparisons about 5 years go on the same >> hardware. Postfix was the fastest, qmail was next, and sendmail was >> slowest. I believe I've also seen similar benchmarks posted on the >> net. I had to do independent testing to satisfy a skeptical >> consulting cilent. > > > In the systems I administer -- small sites, to be sure -- the MTA > itself doesn't impact the speed of delivery nearly as much as > anti-virus and anti-spam scanners. > Agreed. Cheers,
- Previous message: [CentOS] Which imapd?
- Next message: [CentOS] Which imapd?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list