[CentOS] Two small issues after upgrade to 4.2 -- [OT] IPv4 LINKLOCAL
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comMon Oct 24 22:11:44 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Two small issues after upgrade to 4.2 -- [OT] IPv4 LINKLOCAL
- Next message: [CentOS] Two small issues after upgrade to 4.2 -- [OT] IPv4 LINKLOCAL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 16:55, Scot L. Harris wrote: > If you disable zeroconf the 169.254 entry is dropped. What use is it? > Nothing I have found explains what it is used for or why I need it on my > systems. Waving your hands and saying don't be bothered by the > existence of such entries does not explain what it is used for. Getting > rid of it does not impact the systems either. Kind of like an appendix. > :) The idea is that you can plug machines into a local network and have them talk to each other with no setup and no preconfigured DHCP service. Each picks some more-or-less random and hopefully unique address in this subnet. Windows boxes will do it if a DHCP request times out. Machines can find and access each other by name with broadcast based naming like netbios or dns over multicast like rendezvous. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] Two small issues after upgrade to 4.2 -- [OT] IPv4 LINKLOCAL
- Next message: [CentOS] Two small issues after upgrade to 4.2 -- [OT] IPv4 LINKLOCAL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list