[CentOS] Load balancing email?
Jay Leafey
jay.leafey at mindless.comWed Oct 26 22:10:23 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Load balancing email?
- Next message: [CentOS] Load balancing email?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Benjamin Smith wrote: >What do you mean by "not perfect" - it's bad enough that alternatives are >needed? > >-Ben > > The volume processed will differ by as much as 50% between the boxes, but since either box will easily handle the entire volume it's not really an issue. I just feel it's a bit inelegant, but it does have the virtue of simplicity. -- Jay Leafey - Memphis, TN jay.leafey at mindless.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 5322 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051026/2f49bd58/attachment-0001.bin>
- Previous message: [CentOS] Load balancing email?
- Next message: [CentOS] Load balancing email?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list