On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 12:59 +0100, minichaz wrote: > On Tue Oct 25 17:54 , Mauricio Merlin <mauricio at cimed.ind.br> sent: > > >My Centos 4.1 only accept connections from localhost, my file conf is > >default. > >error: ssh: connect to host 192.168.1.78 port 22: No route to host > > > > > >thanks > >_______________________________________________ > >CentOS mailing list > >CentOS at centos.org > >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > This isn't an SSH problem and it's not a firewall problem either as that would > produce a "connection refused" message or similar. You will need to allow > incoming SSH connections on the machine to which you are connecting but you don't > appear to have got to that stage yet. > > "No route to host" would indicate that there's a basic network connectivity > problem between the two machines in question. Check you can ping the machines > from each other, I suspect you can't. > > Most likely you've got a typo in a netmask or something similar. > > Charlie The no route to host can also happen if IPTABLES is not configured to allow port 22 in. here is the error when I try to connect from an unauthorized (via iptables) ip to my server: ssh: connect to host centosg.centos.org port 22: No route to host -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051026/8ee2d8a9/attachment-0004.sig>