Karanbir Singh enlightened us: > You should be able to just grab the sources from > download.fedora.redhat.com and rebuild ? you might need > to update some other core pkgs to satisfy depends tho. As much as I'm labelled a Fedora proponent, the Fedora kernel is not something I'd run on RHEL/CentOS. There's just too many support/changes. Building a RHEL kernel on Fedora is one thing (which I've done to show that you can build RHEL out of Fedora, with just a few SRPMS from RHEL for kernel, etc...). But going the other way is a whole different ballgame -- Fedora kernels don't take to RHEL systems well. If you want Fedora features, IMHO, it's best to rebuild from the RHEL/CentOS kernel, patching in what you need -- sparringly -- from the Fedora kernels. Yes, this is involved. I think Johnny's work on getting a SGI guy on-board is probably the best bet to good XFS support. When Red Hat sees that someone is pro-actively working on solid XFS support for their RHEL kernels, I sincerely hope they take more interest (even if unofficial/unsupported). I would almost argue that there should be just a RHEL kernel with XFS added, and not everything added. But I am in no position with CentOS' development to suggest such. Matt Hyclak <hyclak at math.ohiou.edu> wrote: > I tried this the other day and it builds ok. On install it > wanted a bunch of updated SELinux stuff. I started down the > path, but the checkpolicy src.rpm refused to build, so I > gave up for now. Yeah, there's just too much different between the Fedora and RHEL kernels. -- Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org | (please excuse any http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)