[CentOS] Why is yum not liked by some?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comThu Sep 8 05:15:08 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Why is yum not liked by some?
- Next message: [CentOS] Why is yum not liked by some?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 23:56, David Johnston wrote: > > If you managed a set of servers running homegrown code that > > may or may not be sensitive to library and utility program > > versions, what steps would you use to keep a test server > > up to date, then after performing any needed application > > testing, to roll out the same changes to the production > > servers in various different locations? > > I would use yum to keep the testing system up to date, and use rsync to > copy specific RPM packages to the production server. That's pretty painful when the production servers have better connectivity to the internet than to the test location. > I would not > install yum on the production server at all if you need to control > things tightly. Hmmm... that's not very complimentary of yum's capability. I'd really rather not need to know every single version number myself - just that they are all the same as had been tested. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] Why is yum not liked by some?
- Next message: [CentOS] Why is yum not liked by some?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list