[CentOS] Re: Why is yum not liked by some? -- CVS analogy (correctoin)
Bryan J. Smith
b.j.smith at ieee.orgThu Sep 8 22:42:01 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Why is yum not liked by some? -- CVS analogy (and why you're not getting it)
- Next message: [CentOS] OT: Versioned repos
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith at ieee.org> wrote: > 1. Maintain multiple YUM repositories, even if all but the > original are links to the original. The problem is this is > who defines what the "original" is? That's why you should > maintain your _own_, so it's what _you_ expect it to be. Er, change that 2nd statement: 'The problem is this is who defines what the "multiple" repositories are of?' If you want it to "revision" a new repository and links everytime someone uploads _any_ new package update, that's going to be a PITA on the server end. It's much better for _you_ to download the complete repository, and rsync regularly, and then _you_ decide what "snapshots" you want of the repository. -- Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org | (please excuse any http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Why is yum not liked by some? -- CVS analogy (and why you're not getting it)
- Next message: [CentOS] OT: Versioned repos
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list