[CentOS] Re: Why is yum not liked by some? -- CVS analogy (and why you're not getting it)
Mike McCarty
mike.mccarty at sbcglobal.netFri Sep 9 20:18:07 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Why is yum not liked by some? -- CVS analogy (and why you're not getting it)
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Why is yum not liked by some? -- CVS analogy (and why you're not getting it)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bryan J. Smith wrote: > Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: [snip] >>I've said I wanted yum to not consider additions to a >>repository past a certain timestamp so it will make the >>same update decision it did a week or so ago even if the >>repostitory has additions. > > > And I said that is _impossible_! > > The YUM client _never_ accesses date information during > resolution. > > The YUM repository is a "static web site" and cannot provide > that information. Until he realizes that yum is just wget-on-steroids, you aren't going to make any progress. [snip] > Do you understand this now? Not until he understands that yum is just wget-on-steroids. Mike -- p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} This message made from 100% recycled bits. You have found the bank of Larn. I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you. I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Why is yum not liked by some? -- CVS analogy (and why you're not getting it)
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Why is yum not liked by some? -- CVS analogy (and why you're not getting it)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list